1964 Quarter Date Error

The 6 (six) in the date 1964 looks to be larger than the other three numbers on the
obverse of the coin. Is this an error ? Any thoughts... To be honest I feel the 4 is also a bit bigger than as well but not as much as the number six.
On the reverse side, I also feel the I and C in America seem somewhat bigger ?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

Sorry. That's not an error coin.

 

Yup! Just another crummy Nickel.

 

If you've a ruler you can measure them. However I think if you do you're going to find they're not very far off.

 

I call it circulation smooshiness.
The number 6 took a hit.

 

…Your post title says quarter…obviously it is a nickel.

…And as @paddyman98 opined, smooshy. The 6 and 4 bore more of the brunt of circulation wear than did the 1 and 9, although you can see it also on the right side of the 9.

When the devices flatten from wear it can make them seem larger…imo…Spark

 

i am learning so much from you all besides reading on errors. thank you.

 

Stick with it. The sooner you eliminate what is not an error, the sooner you will find one.