Roman coins - please confirm if I am right with these

Picked up another bunch of Roman coins from a retiring collector. I have identified most to my satisfaction, but would appreciate confirmation on three:
This one I believe is Marius, S11120, and so quite rare. Am I right?


This one I believe is Nerva S3064:


and this one purports to be Augustus S1681, but I suspect is a copy:


Thank you for any assistance. S numbers from the Sear catalogues produced by Spink.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

Yes I believe that is Marius, as it looks just like mine:

Marius Antoninianus, 269

Mint I, Cologne. IMP C MARIVS P F AVG, radiate, draped and cuirassed bust right. SAEC FELICITAS, Felicitas standing left, holding Caduceus and Cornucopiae. Ex Pamphill Hoard (S 11120)

 

@PaddyB
Why do you suspect the Augustus As is a copy?
If the weight is right it is RIC 382, BN 448, Sear 1681. If the weight is low it could be an ancient imitation

 

Thank you @cmezner - I feared it might be a copy because the verdigris looked very fresh (as in a coin that had been artificially aged) and the design of the bust looked a bit naïve. The Sear book is a bit weak on expected weights - this one weighs 11.15g - how does that compare?

 

I see somewhat non-standard lettering on the obverse, for a potential contemporary imitation

 

The weight of your coin is right for a moneyer issue.

In Gallia and in the Danube area Roman coins, including Dupondi and As, were imitated in times of scarce loose cash (Ref.: HAUM-Katalog-15-Roemische-Muenzen.pdf at https://doi.org/10.24355/dbbs.084-201810160940-0
CNG sold one of these issues, weight 7.62 g, noting it is a later imitation (1st and 2nd century). (https://www.cngcoins.com/Coin.aspx?CoinID=122247)

Those ancient imitations are usually underweight, but yours is not, and the head of Augustus on your coin is of a remarkable beautiful style.

 

could you please elaborate? can't see what you mean by "non-standard"

 

That is great - thank you @cmezner - I will mark it up as genuine. I am buying it, along with the others listed in this thread and about 20 others, from a retiring collector. He had acquired these, and many others I have already bought from him and posted here, over the last 50 years. He has very little knowledge of ancient coins and most were unidentified or mis-identified, so it has been a challenge to work out what they are and so offer him a fair price. He has bought them from lots of different sources - some dealers, some junk stores - simply on the basis of "it looks old and interesting"!
There have been about 50 Roman, 20 Sasanian, 20 Byzantine, a few Parthian and a couple of Celtic coins so far. I think we are nearly at the end of the selection now!

 

@PaddyB That is a wonderful start for 2021, and very interesting and fun to attribute your new "old and interesting" coins, enjoy

 

im probably wrong but the letters in EST look a little too skinny and smooth

 

The moneyer issues have very different style of letterings, e.g.
This Plotius Rufus is not an ancient imitation (10.068 g):

while this Plotius Rufus is (7.534 g):



I think that on the last one the letters are definitely not skinny, however, it is an imitation.

Looking at several of these moneyer issues there are very different letterings; I don't think that those follow a standard. I would rather consider weights.

 

In reference to @cmezner's point, I once had an as of Augustus from Taraco. You're cordially referred to @Ocatarinetabellatchitchix's very recent thread on that mint, in southeastern Iberia.
Back to my example, the style was decidedly crude, including both the portrait and the lettering. But my understanding is that, as a relatively recent recent mint, it was decidedly official.