Proof Set error?

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by rlspears10, Dec 26, 2011.

  1. rlspears10

    rlspears10 Member

    Sorry in advance if this is a dumb question...

    I have a 1976 Proof set (the 6 piece set) that is half 1976 and half 1975. The Cent, Nickel, and Dime are all 1975 S, while
    the Half, Quarter, and Dollar are all Bicentennial 1976. Is this normal, or is it some sort of error?


    Thank you for your help.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. james m. wolfe

    james m. wolfe New Member

    its a 1975 proof set

    :hail:its a1975 proof set :hail:
     
  4. ArthurK11

    ArthurK11 Active Member

    The quarter, half, and dollars that were minted in 1975 were dated 1776-1976 for the bicentenial. Sorry but its not an error and its a 1975 set not a 76.
     
  5. Tyler G.

    Tyler G. Active Member

    Are you sure it ain't a 1975 proof set, because they didn't make any half, quarters, dollars with 1975 on them, they put 1776-1976 on em. So if it was a 1975 it would be like that
     
  6. rlspears10

    rlspears10 Member

    Ok, good deal. That was my first assumption, but I wanted to get other opinions as well. The package that it came in says 1976 proof set, so that was my only real confusion. I guess it was just packaged incorrectly. Thanks.
     
  7. Tyler G.

    Tyler G. Active Member

    Does it say 1976 on the set or the box it came in?
     
  8. mikenoodle

    mikenoodle The Village Idiot Supporter

    Yes, you're first instinct was correct. The 1975 US Proof Sets came with 1975 cent, nickel and dime, and bicentennial quarter, half and dollar.

    Someone (and I am assuming that he's NOT referring to the Mint packaging) incorrectly labeled your set.
     
  9. BUncirculated

    BUncirculated Well-Known Member

    It's not an error.

    Only the quarter, half and dollar coins have the dual dates from 1976. Some were struck in 1975 in order to get ahead on striking the dual dates on those denominations.

    This is normal.
     
  10. Mojavedave

    Mojavedave Senior Member

    Couple of things I would suggest;

    1. Be aware that the 40% silver half is worth the whole set in value.

    2. Check the dime for a missing "S" mint mark. It's worth BIG bucks.
     
  11. mikenoodle

    mikenoodle The Village Idiot Supporter

    Dave:

    The set that he has is clad. The 6 piece proof sets all contain clad coins only.

    The only set that has a silver half is the 3 piece proof set in which all 3, the quarter, half and the dollar were struck in 40% silver.

    I would, however look for the no S dime.
     
  12. Cazkaboom

    Cazkaboom One for all, all for me.

    I haven't checked to see if others have posted this, but the Mint started striking the Bicentennials in 1975 for a reason I don't know, so they put it in the Proof/Mint sets in both 1975 and 1976. There were no 1975 dated quarters, Halves, and Eisenhower Dollars struck.

    Great question, though it is not an error.

    ~Cannyn
     
  13. mikenoodle

    mikenoodle The Village Idiot Supporter

    The reason that the US Mint made the bicentennial coinage in 1975 and 1976 was to insure that there would be ample supply of these coins. Coin hoarding and shortages were still fresh in the minds of the US Mint in the early 70s. It was the Mint's plan that they would continue the 1974 date until mid-1975 and then release the new bicentennial coins to be distributed for an entire year and a half.

    It is also interesting to note that the legislation that authorized the bicentennial coinage allowed for a continuation of these bicentennial designs beyond 1976, but that the current year of issue would also have to appear on the coins. This was not necessary, however, as the Mint decided to return to the eagle reverse design in 1977.
     
  14. Mojavedave

    Mojavedave Senior Member


    My mistake Mike. I though all 76 halfs were 40 % silver. However the Clad coins are listed for $9.00 where as the whole set is listed at $8.00 to $11.00.

    Thanks for the clarification.

    Dave
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page