Morgan Silver Dollar toning.........

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Maintain, Apr 29, 2017.

  1. Maintain

    Maintain Active Member

    Is toning an attribute of the type? Does it increase its value? Has any grading service actually attributed toning to the grade? Thanks!!!!!
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Kentucky

    Kentucky Supporter! Supporter

    It will be interesting to see the responses to this. I assume toning would follow the composition of the coin, for example I would expect Morgans and Peace dollars to tone similarly. I don't think toning figures into grading unless it is so severe it is considered environmental damage or blocks the view of features. Some people pay bigggggg bucks for what they consider attractive toning while others couldn't care less.
     
  4. Dm679864

    Dm679864 Member

    Agreed! If its a nice toning (rainbow toning for example) or a nice pattern, some people might be willing to pay more but I doubt its as important as say condition or mintage.
     
  5. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    Toning is a chemical reaction that is caused by the environment of the coin.
    For example, a coin housed in a Dansco or other coin album can acquire "album toning" from the substances in the paper that is used to make the album reacting with the surface of the coin.

    Appealing toning (subjective; depends on each collector's likes) will add a premium to a coin. Sometimes the premium can be significant. For example, an 1881-S Morgan in MS 63 might be a $40-$65 coin. Now if it has monster toning, you could be looking at a $300-$1,000+ coin.

    Grading services should not necessarily consider toning in determining a grade, unless it borders on environmental damage. However, there are many cases where toning will help bump a coin up by a grade or two. Also, NGC may put a STAR designation after the grade for eye appeal (including toning).
     
    micbraun likes this.
  6. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

    Precisely why I don't dabble in toned coins -- trying to get a grip on any justified premiums is beyond my pay grade.
     
  7. micbraun

    micbraun coindiccted

    Right. I am one of them ;-)

    NGC usually adds a star to the grade if a coin has spectacular toning - usually rainbow/monster-toned Morgan dollars.
     
    Insider likes this.
  8. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    That would make sense, wouldn't it? And yet they don't.
     
  9. Cascade

    Cascade CAC Grader, Founding Member

    Depending on the color it can add massive premiums or none or even reduce the price, compared to blast white. Similarly, depending on the color and eye appeal, it can add a point to the grade or deduct a point.
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  10. Cascade

    Cascade CAC Grader, Founding Member

    Common theory is that 1921 Morgan's & all Peace dollars don't tone like 78-04 Morgan's due to a change in how the mint prepared the planchets from the two eras.
     
    Kentucky likes this.
  11. Maintain

    Maintain Active Member

    All interesting. Thank you.
     
  12. Cascade

    Cascade CAC Grader, Founding Member

    Here are a few of my coins where the toning adds many, many, multiples of greysheet to the value. The first 3 are now CAC stickered. The 82s I sold quickly for about 15x bid before I got to send it out and the last not only adds a premium for the color but another premium on top for being a gorgeous PCI toner as there is a rabid fan base that collects PCI toners specifically. And the first one adds another premium for being a textile toner. Notice the dots and lines. That's from toning while sitting next to the burlap mint bag for decades. Textile toners are highly desirable. Especially neon pop color ones like this.

    MBP7K219931-2_opt.jpg MBP7K219930-2_opt.jpg MBP7K219935-2_opt.jpg MBP7K219933-2_opt.jpg MBP7K219963-2_opt.jpg
     
  13. charlietig

    charlietig Well-Known Member

    I'll certainty pay more for an attractively toned coin anyday
     
  14. HawkeEye

    HawkeEye 1881-O VAMmer

    Dave Waterstraat likes this.
  15. Maintain

    Maintain Active Member

  16. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Easy to understand why some might think so, but it only makes sense until you realize that they don't. Then it becomes confusing. Especially when you consider that all of our silver coins, in all denominations, had the same composition, yet all of them tone differently.

    If that was true then you would expect other silver coins from the same eras to tone the same, or at the least in a similar manner. But yet they don't, not even close. So that can't be it either.

    So what causes the vast differences in how coins of the same composition, from the same era as well as from different eras, tone ? There is one simple and very obvious answer. And yet very few see it because it's so obvious they apparently can't see it even though they're looking right at it. It is the luster.

    All struck coins have luster, (and yes that includes Proofs !) but if you look at them carefully you will see that the luster on all of them is quite different. Luster is the one essential ingredient in the mix that people never seem to think of, never seem to realize that without it, there would be little or no colorful toning. That's why you don't see colorful toning on circulated coins - because they have no luster.

    As I mentioned, the luster on all coins is quite different. And if you look at them microscopically you will see that the luster, created by metal flow, is different in width, length, depth and height. That is the distinguishing factor - the differences in luster. And if you think about it, understand that luster itself as well as toning is all a matter of reflection and refraction, THEN it makes sense that those differences in the width, length, depth and height of luster is what causes the differences in how toning looks to our eyes.

    How toning appears to our eyes all hinges on one very simple principle, the angle of incidence equals the angle of reflection. This is a simple illustration that I've used for many years to simulate what luster looks like on the surface of a coin if viewed microscopically -
    /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ - a series of peaks and valleys. Now change the width, length, depth and height of those peaks and valleys and you change the angle of incidence. Round of the tops of the peaks and or the bottoms of the valleys and you change the angle of incidence. Now throw thin film interference into the mix, and you get color. Differences in the thickness of the film, (which equates the thickness or depth of the toning), of course changes the colors as well. But even when the thickness of the film is consistent, at whatever that thickness might be, the angle of incidence changing is still there. And that angle of incidence is determined by the luster. The sharper the edges of those peaks and valleys are the more luster the coin will have. Smooth them over a bit and the less luster it will have. Smooth them over completely and you have no luster at all.

    And consistency is the key element, the more consistent those peaks and valleys are, the sharper the quality of the luster will be. That's why Proof coins have the most luster of any coin, because they have the most consistent surface, a polished surface. And this reflects the light back to our eyes in a very narrow band, a very sharp band, because those peaks and valleys are all every close together. Business strikes reflect the light back to our eyes in a wide band, because the peaks and valleys are farther apart.

    Now back to Morgans and Peace dollars, and the drastic difference in the toning of them - it's quite simple to understand once you understand everything above. It's the peaks and valleys of the luster being different. Peace dollars have a satin finish, Morgan dollars do not, and that changes the luster. Change the luster and you change the toning.

    This is not to say that Peace dollars don't have luster or as much luster as Morgans do - they absolutely do. Some Peace dollars have booming luster that seemingly drips right from the coin ! But it is a different kind of luster, it's not the same as that on a Morgan. So they tone quite differently - as do all coins. And it is all determined by the luster.
     
  17. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    Ahem.

    small-wash-obv.jpg

    You sure do see "colorful toning" on circulated coins. I've got a garish slick SLQ somewhere. It doesn't look the same as toning on a lustrous MS example, certainly not -- but toning, and color, can land on even heavily-worn (or even harshly cleaned!) surfaces.
     
  18. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Back to the topic of toned coins. I've been a toned coin collector for years, although as of recently, my numismatic interests have shifted. I did sell a whole lot of toned Morgans last year, for quite a high premium. Toning, if it is attractive, can throw any price guide out of the window. Many collectors will pay multiple times the graded value for a toned coin that they perceive to be attractive. I could post hundreds of pictures of coins that I sold for 3-20x normal value for the date, as another collector saw said coins as desirable. This is totally a "beauty is in the eye of the beholder" market. Just watch auctions on eBay for nicely toned coins--particularly rainbow toned ones, and vivid textile-toned Morgans. They can go out of sight, price wise. Morgans tend to have toned differently than many other coins, due to their many years of sitting in textile mint bags, in humid locales. Natural chemical reactions have created some extremely artistic results. However, for the OP's information, this is a highly specialized and selective market.
     
  19. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    I didn't say you don't "ever" see it. There are exceptions to almost everything. But how often do you see it ? As a general rule, you don't.
     
  20. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    That's what I've always been told. But weren't there at least some bags of Peace dollars that were treated the same way?

    My impression is that Morgans tone differently from other coins, even when handled exactly the same way -- but I don't know if that impression is true.
     
  21. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Peace Dollars did not have the same storage conditions as Morgans. More of them were in bank vaults, rather than sitting in mint bags for over 50 years. They are more recent, except for the 1921 Morgan, and that coin tends to tone less vividly than the earlier Morgans.
     
    Lehigh96 likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page