Hi everyone from Clanger in the U.K. I found this well clipped half groat from the Canterbury mint recently whilst doing a spot of detecting. Now, I 'think' it's Edward IV, but I've had a look at this kings half groats but can't find a likeness. It weighs 1.6 grams, and is 17 mm's in diameter. Sorry the shots ain't great, hence the multiple photo's, but its bent and dosen't photo well. I'm probably going to try and use the annealing technique to straighten it out, as 'cold' bending it hasn't worked! Hoping someone can tell me if I've got the right King! Thank you in advance, Clanger.
Clanger, You must have a really good detector to find such a small coin. Sorry I can't help you I.D. your 2d. J.T.
Regardless, you've dug a splendid find there, sir! Alas, I am not specialized enough to be able to help with English hammered silver attribution, though there are folks here who are.
I see that your detector is mid-priced for high end machines. No wonder you were able to find this small 'jewel' of a coin. Hope you end up doing the 'gold dance', if that hasn't already happened. Cheers, J.T.
Great find. I have a Groat. Edward IV, (1461-1470 A.D.) AR Groat Light Coinage O: ЄDWΛRD’ DI · GRΛ’ RЄX · ΛnGL’ · Z FRΛnC (saltire stops), crowned facing bust, with trefoil on breast and quatrefoil to left and right of neck; all within tressure of arches, with lis in spandrels. R: POSVI DЄVm · Λ DIVTOR Є’ · mЄVm/ CIVI TΛS LOn DOn (saltire stops), long cross pattée, with three pellets in each quarter. im: Crown London mint, Struck 1466-1467. 3.03g 25mm North 1568; SCBC 2000
I think you have it right. This should be a light half groat. They were minted in Canterbury, Bristol, Coventry, Norwich and York. The heavy half groats were only minted in London. I have two Edward IV pieces, a light groat and an gold angel. The angel of some historic importance because Edward IV introduced it to reflect the increasing values of gold and silver which had made the gold noble obsolete. Edward reduced the size of the penny, and the other coins had to follow suit. Edward introduced the angel for the benefit of the merchant class. Here is the groat that is in my collection. I must confess that I had a bit of a moment with this piece when I put it beside the Henry VI groat I had. It was noticeably smaller, and I feared for a minute that I had bought a counterfeit. Then I looked up the history and understood the nature of the piece. And here is the angel
Wow! They are nice coins. The golden wonders keep escaping me! Thank you for the fab photo's, they certainly help on the i.d front! Cos now I see the lettering can't be Edward, and is in fact Henry VII I think!
Let's see if I can help, you, @clanger. Here is a Henry VII two pence. The keys indicate that this piece was struck at the archbishop of York's Mint. Here is a Henry VII groat.
Henry VII (1485 - 1509 A.D.) AR Groat O: hENRIC DI GRA REX AGL Z FRA, Crowned facing bust in tressure of arches; crown of two arches, outer jeweled (crown 4). ROSVI DEV ADIVTOR MEV CIVITAS LONDON, Long cross; trefoils in quarters, cross end 8, saltire stops, ‘coded’ stops 20/10. London mint; mm:anchor (upright). Struck 1499-1502. Class IIIc 25mm 3.03g Cf. SCBI 23 (Ashmolean), 363; North 1705c; SCBC 2199. Double Struck Obverse Henry VII (1485- 1509 A.D.) AR Half Groat O: ҺЄnRIC’ × VII’ × DI’ × GRΛ × RЄX × ΛGL’, crowned bust right. R: POSVI × DЄV’ × Λ DIVTO Є’ × mЄV’ ×, coat-of-arms over long cross fourchée; two keys below. York Mint; under Archbishop Christopher Bainbridge Struck 1504-1509. IM: Rose 19mm 1.46g SCBI 23 (Ashmolean), 964; North 1751/1; SCBC 2262
The solitary groat found in my present collection is a Henry VI that was found in a clay pot with the Reigate Hoard in Surrey. @clanger- perhaps your next loud signal will prove to be an intact medieval clay pot full of all sorts of goodies- with a gold one at the bottom!
Wow! Thank you taking the time and trouble with all this. Definately got to be Henry as the bottom half of his name on mine corresponds with yours. Brilliant, thank you so much!
Hello Group, I've enjoyed reading this coinage discussion but know absolutely nada about this field of numismatics. Could someone explain how you date these hammered silver coins...or is it strictly by design? Thanks, J.T.
Aside from being bent, that is a spectacular coin. Such a great amount of detail left and no distracting marks such as scratches, stains or corrosion. Sorry I can’t help with ID. I find those coins fascinating and always enjoy looking. Thanks for sharing!
It’s by design and monarch. It gets confusing, too, in cases like sons who continued striking coins in their fathers’ names. Fortunately there’s a good foundation of scholarly research to refer to on this stuff. Not that I do. I personally do not own any of the references and rely upon the auction house or dealer descriptions, as I’m merely a dabbler in this sort of material and definitely not a specialist. Though I’m not a deep-diver in this field, I do find it interesting.