Apathy from coin community towards melting silver coins

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by bugo, Nov 26, 2014.

  1. bugo

    bugo Well-Known Member

    I was reading up on the great silver melts of the '60s and of 1980 and noticed a lot of apathy on this forum. I went to this link:

    https://www.cointalk.com/threads/data-on-1980-silver-melt.113706/

    and many of the posters seemed to be OK with melting silver coins and said if silver prices went high enough, they would melt their coins. I do not feel this way. To me, every silver coin is a treasure that should be preserved, despite condition. I wouldn't melt any of my coins even if silver was $5000 an ounce. The apathy towards these coins is disturbing and troubling to me. There are estimates that 65% of all silver coins minted between 1916 and 1964 were melted between 1966 and 1969. There are also estimates that only 17% of all Morgan and peace dollars (not including the vaporware 1964 peace dollar) are extant. Folks, they're not making any more 1900 Morgans or 1960 silver dimes. There are still silver coins such as the ASE and silver proofs being minted, but there will never be another 1950 Franklin minted and once they're gone, they're gone forever. I've been lucky enough to find some silver in circulation, including nearly 40 silver dimes. Every one of these coins will be preserved for as long as I'm alive and hopefully long after I'm gone, although many of them are in poor condition and considered "junk silver" and aren't worth more than melt.

    What do you think?
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. bdunnse

    bdunnse Who dat?

    Who does the actual melting? Seems like it wouldn't need to be done until the silver needs to be repurposed (e.g. transformed from a coin to silverware). Can you get a higher premium (realize a greater profit) if it is in pure form vs. in 90% form as a coin?
     
    mikenoodle likes this.
  4. jallengomez

    jallengomez Cessna 152 Jockey

    If you value silver coins as coins then buy them up and keep them. The more there are that are melted, the more the numismatic value will go up on extant coins. It doesn't bother me if people want to melt their coins.
     
    Bret Swanie and Kasia like this.
  5. geekpryde

    geekpryde Husband and Father Moderator

    This is how I kinda feel. At the same time, since 90% junk is very liquid, I don't see why people bother melting...
     
    jwitten, spirityoda and jallengomez like this.
  6. jallengomez

    jallengomez Cessna 152 Jockey

    I don't know why people would melt them either. Like you said, junk silver is very liquid. I've also heard that the statistics on the supposed number of coins that have been melted are greatly exaggerated.
     
  7. Vegas Vic

    Vegas Vic Undermedicated psychiatric patient

    Their coin their choice
     
  8. medoraman

    medoraman Supporter! Supporter

    More physical melting has always been done of stuff like silverware sets, etc. but coins have been melted. I remember a dealer in the 70's having like 180,000 BU O mint morgans they had to cash flow so they got sold to a smelter.

    I know the feeling OP, but I just don't stress it much. As long as I am not the one physically selling to a smelter there isn't much I can do about it. I would say, though, that due to the large melts junk silver is actually starting to bring a premium nowadays, so I believe the era of physically melting coins is near its end unless prices skyrocket. If silver skyrocketed to $100 an ounce I would feel no compunction against selling junk silver to a dealer. If he sells to a dealer, that is his issue.
     
  9. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Silver coins are gathered and melted every single day, as are gold coins but to a lesser extent, and this has been going on for literally centuries. And it will continue to go on long after we are all dead. In years past, it was governments who did this, even with their own older coinage. It was the natural way of things, they would melt the old coins to get the silver to make new coins. Now if they didn't want to change the fineness of the silver in the new coins, sometimes they would just use the old coins as planchets for the new coins. But only those old coins whose wear was say F or better were used because those would have the correct weight.

    In this country we all know about the huge melts back in the early 20th century, and those of the '60s when silver was no longer used. But there also one in 1987 when the price of silver shot up.

    [​IMG]


    And more recently, there was a huge melt between 2006 and 2013, which peaked in 2011.

    [​IMG]


    But even when there are no price spikes, silver coins are still being gathered and melted every single day. There are many businesses who do this. SilverTowne for example does a huge business in the melting of silver coins - every day. Some folks just aren't aware of it. Collectors especially don't realize the extent to which silver coins are gathered and melted. But that is largely because of the way they think. To collectors silver coins are something to be saved, cherished, and put safely away purely for their own sake - because they are silver coins.

    But by far the majority of the world doesn't see it that way. To the majority of the world silver coins are nothing more than chunks of bullion and they have no special meaning. It's kind of like how the majority of world, even the vast majority of coin collectors, looks at modern bullion coins - they are nothing but chunks of bullion.

    As to the OP's question, are we as collectors apathetic ? I don't think so. But the reality is that what we think doesn't matter because we are so greatly outnumbered by the rest of the world. For every silver coin we put away they will melt a hundred, a thousand. And they will continue to do so. Especially when there are spikes in the price of silver.
     
    Phil Ham likes this.
  10. bdunnse

    bdunnse Who dat?

    It's not clear to me why there is a need to spend money to convert silver from coin form to some other form of bullion (ingots, bars, whatever).
     
  11. medoraman

    medoraman Supporter! Supporter

    A lot of silver is used industrially. You need to melt down coins to use it in industry. Alternately, when the price spikes up people try to get more bars made that meet the COMEX specs so they can put them on the exchange and trade with them. You cannot deposit junk silver to trade on the exchange with.
     
    micbraun and bdunnse like this.
  12. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    The answer is pretty simple really, because it's a whole lot easier to sell. Think of it this way - how many coin collectors are there in the world ? Now of all those, how many are even interested in buying bulk lots of junk silver ? Your number just got a whole lot smaller.

    Now, how many people are there in the world, including coin collectors, who are interested in buying pure silver bullion ? The number is many orders of magnitude larger. And they will pay more for pure silver than they will junk silver.

    The larger the size of your target audience, the easier it is to sell something.

    It's just like it is with slabbed coins and raw coins. Slabbed or raw any given coin is worth exactly the same amount. But there are a whole lot more people who are willing to buy a slabbed coin than there are those willing to buy that same coin raw. And some, because they don't understand that, are even willing to pay more for them.

    And yeah, I know many want to argue that point and say that slabbed coins are worth more. But they really aren't. It's only a matter of perception and mistaken belief.

    In the end, that's what it comes down to - perception. Coin collectors, because of how they think about coins, how they perceive them, see junk silver as being worth the same as pure silver, proportionally of course. But in it reality, it isn't.
     
    bdunnse likes this.
  13. 19Lyds

    19Lyds Member of the United States of Confusion

    I think, you're either full of baloney or only own 1 silver coin because at $5,000 an ounce, I would simply not hesitate to melt them all.

    I mean, REALLY! Exactly what significance would a 1964-D Quarter or Roosevelt Dime have in regard to history? There are literally hundreds of thousand if not millions of nice uncirculated examples laying around in some safe or store.

    Is it apathy or perhaps fiscal responsibility?
     
  14. fretboard

    fretboard Defender of Old Coinage!

    wow.gif Honestly I think you're a bit on the crazy side. I mean I haven't had any of my coins go directly to the smelter as far as I know, but if silver goes up in price, say over $50 an ounce you're gonna be troubled, that's all I gotta say. ~Cheers!
     
  15. bdunnse

    bdunnse Who dat?

    I wouldn't melt them, but I would definitely sell them.
     
    mikenoodle likes this.
  16. bugo

    bugo Well-Known Member

    In 100 years, how many Morgans will be left in lower than MS 65 condition?

    The thought of melting down silver coins literally makes me sick to my stomach...just like when they crash a classic car in a movie.
     
  17. bugo

    bugo Well-Known Member

    Nope, I'm 100% serious. Some things are more important than money to me...ironically it is money we're talking about in this instance. And I have hundreds of silver coins. As far as regard to history...every coin has a story to tell. As I've said numerous times on this forum...I collect for fun, not for monetary gain. If silver went to $5K an ounce, most of these those uncirculated dimes and quarters would get melted, making them rare.
     
  18. bugo

    bugo Well-Known Member

    You say crazy, I say passionate.
     
  19. coleguy

    coleguy Coin Collector

    I sure wouldn't send any of my coins to the smelter regardless of the price of silver, be it $50 or 5000. But then, I have no "junk" silver either. I don't collect to make a profit, now or ever. Sometimes the history a piece represents is beyond monetary value to me. Is that crazy? Maybe to some, but not to people who collect because they enjoy the collecting.
     
    bugo likes this.
  20. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    I'd be all for melting any and all presidential coins in less then high grade and damaged holed or otherwise problem low grade common coins. As to walkers slq barbers etc I find them still pretty in g-vg and a bit better then melt so no on those
     
  21. krispy

    krispy krispy

    ...You know they usually swap out the classic car and, anymore, they use CG a lot more often than anything physical being banged-up. The beauty shots of classic cars in movies are what you see before careful editing and Hollywood skill that blends the "stunt double" into the myth of the film you are wrapped up in. Similar to how "no animals were hurt during the filming of this movie" the same goes for the cars provided to the movie industry.

    FWIW, I would sell at far less than $5000/oz. There are so many other things to enjoy with the benefit the coins would provide us from that payout! and so many other non-silver coins to collect if the vast majority of them were melted for the silver. Even if only a marginal amount of silver coins survived that only a few mega-billionaires could afford to possess them, we could still enjoy them like the rarities we can only behold in national museum collections.

    Another thing to ease your mind about, despite how many ARE being melted regularly, is to think of how much silver is really out there, still underground and not being actively mined, coming from production of other ore. If the demand is there, there's plenty of resources to go to for vast volumes of it without sacrificing all the coins you're thinking about. With silver at $5000 an ounce they'll reopen the silver mines that are shuttered and scrape the mines clean!
     
    swamp yankee and Mainebill like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page