1984 D over S Lincoln Cent????

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by Kellyrae18, Dec 30, 2013.

  1. Kellyrae18

    Kellyrae18 Member

    So I've recently gotten into error coins and I found this one. Wondering if anyone could tell me what it is
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. non_cents

    non_cents Well-Known Member

    Hi Kelly, the pics are a bit blurry but I have a hunch that what you are seeing is plating issues surrounding the mintmark. After 1982, the mint switched from a composition of 95% copper and 5% zinc to a cent with a 97.5% zinc core with a 2.5% copper plating. The plating can crack, split, or otherwise become damaged and can appear to be something it is not. Unfortunately, plating issues are quite common and generally do not command a premium.

    Keep up the hunt!
     
  4. furryfrog02

    furryfrog02 Well-Known Member

    non_cents beat me to it!
    ...and explained it way better than I ever could :)
     
  5. Kellyrae18

    Kellyrae18 Member

    I thought that might be the case. This might be a weird question, but how do you tell the difference
     
  6. non_cents

    non_cents Well-Known Member

    A lot of it has to do with just reading up and studying die varieties and errors. Also, once you have searched for a while and have found examples of repunched mintmarks, you will know what to look for as you can see the difference in-hand.

    I have a few really good sites bookmarked that are great for introduction into die varieties.

    http://lincolncentresource.com (also has a great forum)
    http://coppercoins.com/advsearch.php (put in the date, mintmark, and variety type and click search to look at the examples)
    http://error-ref.com
    http://doubleddie.com
    http://varietyvista.com
    http://conecaonline.org
    http://errorvariety.com

    Hope this helps. :)
     
    Phoenix21 likes this.
  7. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor Supporter

    If you look carefully at the "S" mint mark used during that date ( perhaps on another 1984 S cent you can find, and draw the general shape or just have it handy and try to arrange it to fit what you might see as an "S" under the "D". If all visible parts fit, then there would be a case, but if only one part ( such as maybe the bottom area of the "D" ) might fit but no others then not. The mint marks for a particular year are about the same size, but different shapes , so you can't have one only show a small area and not be able to see some of the rest. For D/S type of coins, the mid diagonal of the "S" should be seen in the opening of the "D", and the "S" presence/absence of serifs and "squarish " or rounded helps also. I agree with the post above , and welcome to the forum. Jim
     
  8. rascal

    rascal Well-Known Member

    When I saw your avatar I forgot all about coins
     
  9. kookoox10

    kookoox10 ANA #3168546

    Laying it on pretty thick, aren't we?

    As far as the blistering, if you can imagine your skin getting really sunburnt. After a while you develop the under-the-skin blisters (normal healing process for burns), think of plating blisters in much the same fashion. They're just unsightly bubbles forming under the skin of copper. Only these will never get better.
     
    non_cents likes this.
  10. AWORDCREATED

    AWORDCREATED Hardly Noticeable

    Way to go, but I refrain from calling you anything :p
     
    rascal likes this.
  11. rascal

    rascal Well-Known Member

    see I gave you like for not calling me names
     
  12. atrox001

    atrox001 Senior Member

    I'm not so sure this is a plating issue...looks more like it took a hit, PMD.

    Larry Nienaber
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page