1980 Mint Set Error?

Discussion in 'What's it Worth' started by sixty7chevy, Sep 28, 2017.

  1. sixty7chevy

    sixty7chevy New Member

    While sorting through some coins I looked over a 1980 mint set to see if the Lincoln penny was a DDO (twas not) and noticed the dime in the Philadelphia set bearing a "D" mintmark. To ensure I wasn't losing my mind, I referenced the U.S. Mint website, my redbook, my error book and rechecked the mintmark multiple times. Can anyone shed some light on the rarity of this? Being that it is a "1980 P-D-S" set, the "error" lies in the fact that it does not contain a dime from the Philadelphia mint. I can't seem to find anything where this error has been acknowledged yet. Could it possibly someday have a value similar to those of the famous Proof sets that contain "no S cent/nickel/dime"?
    What are yall's thoughts?
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. USCoinCollector42

    USCoinCollector42 Well-Known Member

    Pictures? Sounds interesting.
     
  4. Muzyck

    Muzyck Rabbits!

    I fail to see the "value" in what seems like a possible error in packaging. If it is a "mint set" it is just a business strike, correct? What am I missing here?
     
  5. Oldhoopster

    Oldhoopster Member of the ANA since 1982

    Packaging errors on mint sets rarely carry a premium and often times are worth less because they don't have all of the correct coins.
     
  6. Michael K

    Michael K Well-Known Member

    A "mint set" is not a proof set.
    Photos please.
     
  7. sixty7chevy

    sixty7chevy New Member

    I think my wording may have been misleading. Obviously a mint set is not a proof set, I was using this for comparison. If it were to ever gain the acknowledgement similar to the "1968 S 'with no S dime' Proof set" (reference pg. 354 of Red Book), say "1980 P-D-S 'with no P dime' Mint set," I think it would be safe to say it could possibly see a significant increase in value that is
     

    Attached Files:

  8. sixty7chevy

    sixty7chevy New Member

    similar to the increase in value that the 1968 "no S dime" proof set has when compared to a normal 1968 proof set containing an S dime.


    Sorry for making one post into two posts to add to any confusion. This Friday feels like a Monday.
     
  9. Oldhoopster

    Oldhoopster Member of the ANA since 1982

    You are mixing 2 different things here.

    The No S and No P coins are rare mint errors. These coins were struck by dies that were missing the mintmark, and very few were minted. The No S coins are Proofs and can easily be differentiated from business strike coins made without mintmarks. All 1980 dimes have a mintmark (PDS), so anything without a mintmark (and not altered after minting) is from this specific die and rare.

    Your mint set is a packaging mistake. The US mint made over 700 million 1980-P and 1980-D dimes. The packaging mistake just gave you an extra D Mint that is no different than the other 700 million coins and shorted you a P mint.

    People usually buy mint sets to get 1 example of each coin. Yours is missing one. It is an interesting conversation item, but not worth anything.

    Hope that helps explain the difference
     
  10. sixty7chevy

    sixty7chevy New Member

    LOL, I can't believe I got that mixed up now that it has been laid out for me. Guess the "mood chooser" I chose was spot on! Thank you Oldhoopster for clarifying!
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page