1968 Washington quarter - possible error?

Discussion in 'What's it Worth' started by firesideguy, Jul 17, 2011.

  1. firesideguy

    firesideguy Member

    I have a 1968 Washington quarter with what appears to be a ' 7 ' between the 6 and the 8 in 1968. Also i can make out other non-discernible makings (possibly numbers) between the 9 and 6 in 1968. Is this in fact an error or what would cause this? Does it affect the value?

    1968_possible_error.jpg 1968_possible_error-REV.jpg

    Thanks for your help. I'm still learning
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. BUncirculated

    BUncirculated Well-Known Member

    Looks like PMD to me. Value is, $.25.
     
  4. firesideguy

    firesideguy Member

    Seems to be a standard answer - for us newbies who are still learnig, please elaborate as to what makes it PMD?
     
  5. rickmp

    rickmp Frequently flatulent.

    Looks, too, like a shadow 1 between the 1 and 9; a shadow 9 between the 9 and 6; and the shadow 7 between the 6 and 8. No shadow after the 8, though.
     
  6. Hobo

    Hobo Squirrel Hater

    Your brain is playing tricks on you. The marks are nothing more than random marks on the coin but your brain sees them as something familiar.

    There is a word for this. Pareidolia - the tendency to interpret a vague stimulus as something known to the observer, such as interpreting marks on Mars as canals, seeing shapes in clouds, or hearing hidden messages in reversed music.
     
  7. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    Or patterns in graphs of market prices. :devil:
     
  8. BUncirculated

    BUncirculated Well-Known Member

    PMD, Post Mint Damage, means it occurred after it was minted, and left the mint.
     
  9. medoraman

    medoraman Supporter! Supporter

    Isn't that the truth.......Hobo has it completely right of course, the human eye tries to either make sense of randomness or see what it wants to see. I have seen upteen 1916d's that the owner somehow sees a D on there, somewhere.

    This is why most numismatists are loathe to describe a new variety on anything other than a BU coin. Damage in circulation can do a lot to a coin, making it impossible to determine if it left the mint that way. If there were an example already documented what you are claiming, or your example were in higher grade, it would be easier to believe it could be a new variety. This is the source of most "PMD" responses firesideguy.

    Chris
     
  10. firesideguy

    firesideguy Member

    Thanks for the info Hobo.

    I guess I'll start to worry more about the pareidolia when I start seeing these shapes in shaving cream, pillows or mashed potatoes. :eek:
     
  11. Hobo

    Hobo Squirrel Hater

  12. domdino

    domdino Junior Member

    I thought Usama was shot above the left eye.
     
  13. Numismania

    Numismania You hockey puck!!

    Hobo...I had to Google that word (not that I didn't believe it existed, or your definition), as I had NEVER heard of it, nor SEEN it....lol There's tons of numismatic terminology I still don't know yet (and I've been collecting for more than half my life..though I'm only 25...lol), so don't do that to me again, please??? (j/k) LOL
     
  14. Carl Roberts

    Carl Roberts New Member

    I to, have a 1968 D quarter with the same markings. I found it coin hunting in a friends back yard with my Whites metal detector. As I understand it the coin was struck on a Canadian quarter instead of a planchette. What you see is the date 1967 under the 1968 date. Mine also has some lettering as well. If this is true we may have coins of value! I have, as of yet, found only one post related to this hybrid coin. If anyone has more information about it, please, relate
     
  15. rickmp

    rickmp Frequently flatulent.

    Welcome to CT. This thread is almost 7 years old. You'll get better results by starting your own thread with photos of your coin.
     
  16. Jfresh

    Jfresh New Member

    I have one also same marks
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page