1958 British gold sovereign. Should I have it graded?

Discussion in 'World Coins' started by Aircldtype3, Feb 11, 2017.

  1. Aircldtype3

    Aircldtype3 Active Member

    I recently inherited this gold sovereign. I was wondering if it would be worth while sending to a TPG. 20170211_161955.jpg 20170211_162013.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. CoinG1901

    CoinG1901 Member

    Now this is what I would do myself. I would set it aside in a temporary holder and then get some more Sovereigns of different years and then decide if it is worth sending in. But I would also say to you that why not. Go for it. Good to have something like that graded for whatever reason.
     
    TheEgyptian likes this.
  4. Aircldtype3

    Aircldtype3 Active Member

    My collection is basically all US coins, so it doesn't really fit. But it is a beautiful coin when viewed in person. I guess what I wanted to know is if the resale value between raw and graded is a big enough difference to justify sending it in. I'd grade it as an MS 62...
     
  5. CoinG1901

    CoinG1901 Member

    That is a difficult question. I guess to solve that, you would need to know the amount of gold in the Sovereign if there is any. And then determine the weight of the gold. Then take the current price of gold and convert it into Pounds as a UK estimated price. Basically, maybe do not send it. But if you want to, go ahead.
     
  6. Oldrdawg

    Oldrdawg Active Member

    Sending in it by itself is a dicey proposition because of the cost of grading, postage, insurance, etc. I've always heard that the rule of thumb is that you should wait until you're sending in at least 10 coins so that the costs can be spread over all the coins. It doesn't make it cheaper, just cheaper per piece. My local coin dealer takes submissions from his clients and sends them all in together. Whatever small markup he adds to the process for himself is nothing compared to the savings associated with making a large submission. If your a member of a club or have a dealer like mine nearby, it might be worth looking into.
     
    TheEgyptian and Aircldtype3 like this.
  7. Oldrdawg

    Oldrdawg Active Member

    BTW, it's a beautiful piece.
     
    Aircldtype3 likes this.
  8. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    I am missing something. Why doesn't it look Gold?
     
  9. CoinG1901

    CoinG1901 Member

    It does have gold on the outside. Or at least the appearance. It is not a strong look of gold.
     
  10. scottishmoney

    scottishmoney Buh bye

    Unless you have a coin that you are sure is going to be a commendable grade, I'd pass on having it TPG'd.
     
    Aircldtype3 likes this.
  11. Aircldtype3

    Aircldtype3 Active Member

    The pictures were a bit overexposed. This is a better representation of the color.

    20170211_192912.jpg
     
    Last edited: Feb 11, 2017
    Pickin and Grinin likes this.
  12. Aircldtype3

    Aircldtype3 Active Member

    I appreciate everyone's input and knowledge. I think I'll take it to my favorite LCS on Monday and have it looked at.

    I have five Morgan dollars that I was going to send into PCGS soon, so I may piggyback this one along.
     
  13. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    Nice pic! I had looked the coin over for Authentic, but the color was just off. I could see some hints of Gold coloring. Thanks.
     
    Aircldtype3 likes this.
  14. afantiques

    afantiques Well-Known Member

    The later sovs are just bullion coins, they trade at a very small premium of melt in Britain which means that not only are they easy to find from dealers like http://www.goldline.co.uk/
    but pretty well all examples are in nice uncirculated condition because they have never had any read reason to come out of the original packaging, let alone be passed around from pocket to pocket.

    Possibly for the US market grading may be worth the cost, but be aware that pretty well all examples that are graded will have high MS numbers due to the non-circulating nature of the coins.

    I'd say don't do it. It's really just a chunk of 22 carat bullion in a handy size and value.
     
    Aircldtype3 likes this.
  15. Aircldtype3

    Aircldtype3 Active Member

    Well maybe I'll just upgrade to a nicer case for display and enjoy it as is. Thank you for the input.
     
  16. willieboyd2

    willieboyd2 First Class Poster

    Although gold sovereigns are bullion coins now, they have been used in the past by British secret agents operating in various parts of the world.

    [​IMG]

    :)
     
    TheEgyptian and Aircldtype3 like this.
  17. sakata

    sakata Devil's Advocate

    I would say that it is most unlikely you would recover the cost of having it graded. All modern sovereigns are essentially nothing but bullion. They have never seen circulation and so should all be mint state. 1958 us a common date: I have several of them which I bought purely for their bullion value and yours looks no different from any of mine.

    As I write this the melt value is $290. The catalog value based on Numismaster online is BV for XF and $425 for UNC. I wouldn't give much credence to that UNC price. I bought mine several years ago from APMEX at about 5% above spot and, as I say, they look about as good as yours.
     
    Aircldtype3 likes this.
  18. Stork

    Stork I deliver

    It's a nice bit of bullion, but I wouldn't bother grading it. It's a lovely way to hoard bullion but it's not a 'collectible' in that grade IMO.
     
  19. Zonker

    Zonker Active Member

    Unless you are planning on a registry set, I wouldn't have it graded. Even then you should try for a higher grade. 1958s are common.
     
  20. Aircldtype3

    Aircldtype3 Active Member

    I ended up selling it over the weekend at a show. The funds will help fuel my Morgan dollar addiction. :smug:
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page